0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°¡Á·ÀÇ °Ç°­ ÁõÁø-º¸È£ ¸ðÇü¿¡ ÀÔ°¢ÇÑ »ç°í¿¹¹æ ÇàÀ§ ºÐ¼®

The Behavior Analysis of Home Injury Prevention based on the The Behavior Analysis of Home Injury Prevention based on the

Áö¿ª»çȸ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 12±Ç 2È£ p.406 ~ 416
KMID : 0607720010120020406
ÀÌÀμ÷ ( Lee In-Sook ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

This study is performed to confirm the influencing factors of family health protection behaviors using the variables included in Pender¡¯s Family Promotion Model. 1. The subjects are 110 families in preschooler family developmental stage, respondents are children¡¯s mother or father. These families are almost all nuclear types(95%), function of families is healthy as much as 8.0 the mean FAPGAR score. The prevalence rate of family members¡¯ illness was 14.7% these last 3 months. and 21.1% of families responded suffered from injury for last 2 years. 2. The practice rate of injury prevention behavior is below a half in supervision and modifying of their home and residential environments, especially controlling though collaborative community power. The more familiar function score is the better practicing rates of injury prevention behaviors. 3. The injury prevention behaviors correlate to family size, health status of family member, and children 5 congenital defects with statistical significance. Families¡¯ economic condition correlates also significantly to family health status, cognition of benefits of injury prevention, cognition of the importance of community collecting power. And the recognition of the benefits of injury prevention correlates the adaptive health concept, family norms about injury prevention, economic status. 4. Considering family health promotion model, the general influencing factor is only affected to family protective behavior, and other paths don¡¯t affect to family¡¯s behaviors. In simple regression, the family protective behavior model explains 27.8% (P=0.05). significant factors are family function status. family size, chronic illness of family members¡¯, mother¡¯s education level, father¡¯s age. 5. To define of familiar preventive behavior as a unit is very important, but it has the limitation to solve the difficulties of family studies going with the operationalized difficulties of health promotion concept.
KeyWords
°¡Á·°Ç°­ÁõÁø-º¸È£, »ç°í¿¹¹æÇàÀ§
Family health promotion, Injury prevention
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed